Part 2
of The Reader took on an unexpected
and interesting spin from the first part of the story. We have now been exposed
to Hanna’s past, and I think that her experiences in the concentration camps
can provide some insight to her behavior and relationship with Michael. The
most prominent aspect that this experience reveals, in my opinion, is her need
to be in control. Throughout Part 1 of the novel, the author reveals Hanna’s
character as one that thrives on being in constant control and dominating
Michael. I think the fact that Michael is so much younger than her contributes
to a deeper understanding of her being. Given that she is 21 years older than
he is, she may have felt a sense of superiority over him. Her utilization of
the term “kid” also provides a sense of his inferiority to her. Now that we are
aware of her past as a concentration camp guard, the whole idea of dominance
and control makes a lot more sense. While I still find her relationship with
Michael to be uncomfortable and weird, I think I do have a better understanding
about it. Just like she needed him to feel superior, Michael needed her to gain
confidence and become less passive. With regard to her illiteracy, this news
did not really come as a complete shock to me. Her strong interest in the books
from Michael’s father’s study drew attention to that subject area, in addition
to the fact that she constantly requested that Michael read to her. I did not
expect the story to take such a turn, but I think it has provided us with a
better sense of understanding the relationship between Michael and Hanna.
No comments:
Post a Comment