The way in which part two surprised me the most. Everything
was returning to normal, which was expected, and then he studies law. While he
is very mechanical, he becomes radical. I do not like the way in which tis
happens. He is too indulged in his studies and these thoughts. I could not
believe that he accused his father of alleged war crimes. He then goes to
trial, which is in another town. WHAT A COINCIDENCE that Hanna is there. He is
able to recognize her without seeing her, and all his questions are answered. Although
I did not expect this, I do not know what I think about it. In a way it is cliché
and annoying, but he knows the answers and where she left. She was a prison
guard in Auschwitz. He comments on the way that she looks arrogant, but at the
beginning of part two that is how I would describe him. He made himself feel
superior, especially at school, where he felt it was too easy.
I also liked the way in which the narrative would go from
the trial to further in the past. He was trying to connect why he was
emotionally numb at one point, and at another point he tried to picture Hanna
as one of the guards in the book. He could not figure out which guard she would
be. I thought it was interesting that she took responsibility for her actions
and that the other defendants just blamed it on her. She would give actual
answers, and the others lied about even their alibis.
So far I like the novel. It makes more sense now that I have
read the second part, and I look forward to finishing the novel this weekend. I
honestly do not know what to expect as an ending.
No comments:
Post a Comment